intel hd graphics 4400 vs amd radeon r7 m260

Detailed benchmarks can be found below.ĭue to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, the power consumption is relatively low and suitable even for tablets. In addition to the TDP of 11.5 watts, the Y-series CPUs are rated at an SDP (average power consumption) of 4.5 or 6 watts (depending on the model).ĪMD Radeon R7 M260X ► remove from comparison Many current titles like Battlefield 4, however, are not playable even at minimum graphic quality.

In simple games like Anno 2070 or Counter Strike: Global Offensive, the performance is sufficient to handle low settings and 1024 x 768 pixels. Therefore, the clock rates are relatively low. Compared to a similar clocked HD 4000, the HD 4200 is somewhat faster due to architectural improvements and an increased number of execution units: The GT2 version integrates 20 EUs, compared to 16 EUs for the old HD 4000. The performance of the HD Graphics 4200 is clearly below the HD 4600 and HD 4400, since the GPU is designed for ULV models of the Y-series (11.5 W). It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder. The GPU supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 und OpenGL 4.0.

In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified in several details. The Intel HD Graphics 4200 (GT2) is a processor graphics card that is included in some of the ULV Haswell processors of 2013 (4th generation core). The relatively low base clock can be automatically overclocked using Turbo Boost technology.

Intel HD Graphics 4200 ► remove from comparison

Intel hd graphics 4400 vs amd radeon r7 m260